13 years of off-leash enforcement in Seattle: rising cost, falling output.
Seattle Animal Control's records cover 13 years of off-leash (“Dog Loose in Park,” DLP) enforcement. Citation output peaked in 2018, fell sharply during the COVID period, and has not recovered. The program's cost per published citation has risen. Across the full record, the available data does not show the program reducing violations — first-time offenders remain the overwhelming majority of citations every year. The 2026 staffing expansion is being implemented without a published evaluation of the 2016 expansion's results.
Finding 01Fewer citations, and a rising program cost per published citation.
Citation volume has fallen well below its 2018 peak, while the program's staffing cost has held roughly flat (and is set to roughly double in 2026). The result: the cost attributable to each citation has risen. The bars show citations issued per year; the line shows the program's annual cost divided by that year's citations — a cost-to-output ratio, not the price of writing a single ticket. The MOA defines the ACO/FMW team's work as primarily educational, so citations are one output among several (warnings, contacts, deterrent presence); read the line as a trend in cost against the one output the city publishes, not as a unit production cost.
Across 2014–2025, fee revenue ($351,099 cumulative) covered roughly 11% of the program's estimated $3.34M FAS+FMW cost. In the MOA-documented era (2016 on), the program cost per published citation was lowest in the peak-output years — $229 in 2018 — and highest in the trough — $1,730 in 2022. Even the 2024 partial recovery to 447 citations leaves cost-per-citation at $654, nearly triple the 2018 figure. Because the announced 2026 expansion roughly doubles staffing cost, holding the existing cost-per-citation ratio would require citation output to roughly double from current levels — which it has not approached in any year since 2019.
Finding 02The arc: 2016 build-up, COVID crater, 2026 expansion.
Annual DLP citations rose roughly seven-fold from 2014 to 2018 after the April 2016 Animal Control Officer + paired Facilities Maintenance Worker team went full-time. Output cratered during the COVID period and has not returned to anything near peak. The shaded box at right shows the range of plausible 2027–2028 output if the announced 2026 expansion (roughly double the staffing) is fully deployed.
Three phases are visible. The 2016–2019 build-up: citations climbed from 183 (2014) to a 1,276 peak (2018). The COVID-era crater: 2020 fell to 393 (−67% from 2019), and output has not recovered — the strongest year since the COVID period (2024) reached 447, about a third of peak. The 2026 expansion: doubling staffing produces a projected 2027–2028 range of roughly 894 citations/year (if per-officer output stays at the 2024 rate) to 2,552/year (if it returns to the 2018 peak rate). Per-officer output has not exceeded ~225 in any year since 2019, so the lower half of that range is the more likely outcome absent a change in approach.
Finding 03No measurable shift away from first-time offenders.
If enforcement were deterring repeat violations, the share of citations going to people cited before would be expected to grow over time as a stable population of repeat offenders accumulates contacts. Instead, first-time offenses have stayed the overwhelming majority every year — and their share has risen, not fallen.
First offenses have ranged from about 84% to 96% of DLP citations in every year of the record, rising over time rather than falling. One reading is that enforcement is deterring repeat offenses. A second reading is that lower total citation volume mechanically reduces the chance of an officer encountering the same person twice, which would push the first-offense share up regardless of behavior. The two cannot be separated here: neither PRR includes owner identifiers that would let us track individuals across citations. What the data does show is that the offense mix never shifted toward repeat offenders — the pattern is consistent with a program issuing fresh first-time contacts year after year, not one drawing down a shrinking pool of repeat violators. SPR's own 2016 owner survey found 39% of dog owners admit weekly-to-monthly illegal off-leash use; no follow-up survey has been published (see what SPR has not measured).
Citations per officer-FTE per year
A productivity view of the same record: DLP citations divided by the total ACO+FMW FTE attributable to off-leash enforcement. Shown from 2016 on (the MOA-documented full-team era); pre-2016 part-time FTE is imputed and not directly comparable. Among these years, per-FTE output peaked at 638 in 2018 and fell to 224 by 2024 — about a third of peak. 2026 partial-year excluded.
Finding 04Enforcement concentrates in a few large parks.
Citations are not spread evenly across the city. A small number of large, heavily-used parks account for most citations in every year. The records do not say why these parks were chosen — whether because violations concentrate there, because patrols were directed there, or both.
Citations cluster where designated OLAs aren't. Discovery, Volunteer, Cal Anderson, Lincoln, Martha Washington, Wallingford Playfield, Seward, and Maple Leaf Reservoir all rank in the top 20 and none has a dedicated OLA on site. Magnuson and Westcrest appear as hotspots because the non-OLA portions of those large host parks are used off-leash. The top 10 parks accounted for 46% of citations before COVID and 40% after — concentration eased somewhat but the same handful of parks still dominate. The data records where citations were issued, not why officers were there, so it cannot establish whether a given park is a hotspot because of higher violation rates or because patrols were directed to it. One post-COVID shift is worth noting without over-reading: West Queen Anne Playfield is the only top-10 pre-COVID park whose citation volume did not fall with the citywide decline — consistent with enforcement attention following community complaints in that area, though the data alone cannot confirm the cause.
Finding 05Citation density vs. walkable OLA coverage.
Overlaying citation density on the half-mile walksheds around every existing OLA (the Trust for Public Land 10-minute-walk standard) shows citation activity concentrating in areas without walkable OLA coverage.
Citation density concentrates outside OLA walksheds. North of the Ship Canal — Wallingford, Ravenna, Maple Leaf, Green Lake, Laurelhurst — shows heavy density with little walkable OLA coverage. The Queen Anne / Magnolia core has Kinnear (0.124 acre) and Magnolia Manor (0.48 acre), both below the AKC one-acre minimum, and a citation band through Discovery, West Queen Anne Playfield, and Smith Cove. Lincoln Park (West Seattle) carries 173 cumulative citations; the nearest OLA, Westcrest, is 3.4 miles away.
Finding 06The full top-20 table.
| Rank | Park | Neighborhood | Total 2014–2026 | Pre-COVID | Post-COVID | OLA? |
|---|
Citation counts measure enforcement activity, not underlying violation rates. A drop in citations could mean fewer violations or fewer patrols. SPR's 2016 People, Dogs and Parks owner survey found 39% of dog owners admit weekly-to-monthly illegal off-leash use; no follow-up survey has been published. The 2026 staffing expansion is being implemented without a publicly-released review of the 2016 expansion's effect on behavior. Pending public-records requests that would help close these gaps:
- SPR program evaluation, deployment logs, and 2026 expansion decision record (PRR #8, filed; SPR responding)
- Find-It-Fix-It “dog in a park” complaints by year — an independent behavior proxy (PRR #2, pending)
- Current SPR/SAS MOA and 2026 budget lines for the expanded staffing (PRR #7, partial — CBO closed with no records; SPR responding)
Until these land, this page can describe enforcement output and cost but cannot prove or disprove that the program changed behavior. Policy implications are discussed on the opinion page.
Source & method
Citation records come from two Seattle public records requests. C049204 (filed 2019-08-29, produced 2019-10-15 by SPR) covers Dog Loose in Park citations 2014-01-01 through 2019-10-15. C263949 (filed 2026-04-17, produced May 2026 by Seattle FAS) covers all parks-related violations 2019-01-01 through 2026-04-17. Raw files and documenting READMEs are at data/prr-responses/. The consolidated CSV (enforcement-citations.csv) is built by build_enforcement_datasets.py and checked by verify_enforcement_data.py.
Why DLP-only, and the 2019 overlap
This page restricts to Dog Loose in Park citations across both requests so each year is measured identically. C263949's broader categories (license, scoop, permit-at-large, etc. — 517 additional post-2019 rows) stay in the consolidated CSV under violation_category but are not in the year series. Both PRRs contain 2019: C049204 ends 2019-10-15 (partial), C263949 covers the full year. The build uses C263949's full-year 2019 as authoritative, so the rebuilt 2019 figure (1,181 DLP) is higher than the legacy site's 1,029 (which was Jan–Oct only).
2026 is a partial year
C263949 ends April 17, 2026 — day 107 of the year, about 29%. Charts mark 2026 as partial. Where a full-year comparison is needed, the annualized equivalent (YTD ÷ 0.293) is shown as a dashed marker, not treated as actual. The cost-per-citation and per-FTE lines stop at 2025 to avoid the partial-year denominator inflating the most recent point.
Headcount & cost assumptions
Annual ACO+FMW FTE attributable to off-leash enforcement: 0.5 ACO (2014–2015, imputed from PRR context); 0.75 ACO + 0.75 FMW for the 2016 transition year; 1.0 ACO + 1.0 FMW (2017–2025, per the 2016 and 2021 MOAs); doubling to 2.0 ACO under the 2026 expansion. FAS-side ACO II cost = $152,399/yr (sourced, 2021 MOA Attachment A). FMW pairing = $140,000/yr (author estimate; SPR does not publish a per-FMW off-leash line). The exact 2026 MOA terms are pending PRR #7. Pre-2016 and 2016-transition FTE are the softest assumptions here and are flagged accordingly.
Location quality
Of the 7,015 DLP citations, about 89% are confidently attributable to a named park (top contributors: Discovery 564, Magnuson 367, Volunteer 328, Woodland 291, Golden Gardens 227). The rest are street-address citations (geocoded separately, used in the Finding 05 heatmap) or blank locations (excluded from spatial analysis). Park-name canonicalization is documented in METHODOLOGY.md.